<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bengt-erik norum &#187; work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bengt.org/archives/tag/work/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bengt.org</link>
	<description>a geek and his life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:56:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>100th post</title>
		<link>http://bengt.org/archives/2007/06/100th-post.php</link>
		<comments>http://bengt.org/archives/2007/06/100th-post.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.norum.com/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m a geek.</p>
<p>i can geek out on almost anything.  in trying to figure out how i&#8217;m going to structure the work my team will do over the next year, i did a fair amount of research on the topic of &#8220;innovation&#8221;.  i totally geeked out on it, and came out the other side feeling dumber for my efforts.  connceptually, it seemed a little odd to research &#8220;innovation&#8221;.  in my mind, research is an attempt to uncover &#8220;prior art&#8221; (what other people have done), while innovation is all about the forward looking and the &#8220;radical departure from status quo.&#8221;</p>
<p>having said that, i really really really like talking to people who have a novel approach to solving an old/common problem or a clever application of a new technology and want to give my team some space to do that.  i have some ideas about how i might acheive this, but wanted to back them with &#8220;measurable goals&#8221;.</p>
<p>the earth-shattering outcome of my research?  i&#8217;ll save you the frustration and brain damage:</p>
<ul>
<li>i&#8217;m really glad i&#8217;m not the director of it for some small company.
<li>lots of people think their reuse of something clever someone else did is &#8220;innovative&#8221;.
<li>&#8220;innovation&#8221; is a good way to explain something that you spent a bunch of time on that still hasn&#8217;t paid off.
<li>people who do innovative work don&#8217;t generally use the word in a sentence without &#8220;air quotes&#8221;.
<li>and&#8230; the only thing i&#8217;ll retain&#8230; there are two approaches to innovation, supply driven and demand led.  (more in the following paragraph)
</ul>
<p>two simple thoughts:<br />
supply-driven innovation occurs when you have a new technology looking for a problem.  (&#8220;oh, look!  new hammer!  where nail?&#8221;)<br />
demand-led innovaiton occurs when you have a problem looking for a solution.  (&#8220;pile of nails and i got nothing heavy.&#8221;)
<p>yep.  that&#8217;s it.
<p>it&#8217;s not much, but it&#8217;s what i took from three hours of reading papers on innovation, metrics to evaluate the impact of innovation, and a fair amount of meaningless drivel.</p>
<p>side note: in the right light diana krall sounds an awful lot like queen latifah.  <em>(see also: various artists: we all love ella: celebrating the first lady of song)</em></p>
<p>this is my 100th post to bengt.org.  based on some pretty weak apache log analysis, i estimate that roughly 165 people will read this over the next year.  i apologize in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bengt.org/archives/2007/06/100th-post.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

